The line switch (file.val++) { just can't be right. Currently it's just incrementing the first "val" of the file chain like the "mem.val++" below it. I expect you'll need to get rid of the ++ on that line then do something about incrementing a pointer to an instruction rather than...
The condition for premature end of the program execution is here: while (indexOfCommands < length && numOfCommands < 60000) { ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ // interpret BF opcodes numOfCommands++; } You have underestimated how many instruction BF needs to do simple things. (I'm not sure why that condition is in there. Remove it...
Your interpreter likely uses a Perl function such as “chr” to convert cell values to characters upon output, and does not limit cell values to [0;255]. While this can be useful in some calculations, the Brainfuck output is normally bytes, whereas Unicode codepoints are usually encoded as UTF-8, and even...
Your problem are not square backets. You problem are < and >. They are intended to handle stream redirection, < xxx means get input from xxx, > xxx means send output to xxx You can enclose the text in double quotes or can escape the "problematic" characters preceding them with...
Here is a simple version. Assume we name the first three cells y, temp0 and x. Then we can simply use this algorithm within a decrementing loop: +++ # Input number [ # loop while this is not 0 >[-] # addition algorithm <[>>+<+<-] # addition algorithm >[<+>-] # addition...
algorithm,division,modulo,brainfuck,divmod
Here's what happens: # >n 0 d This line, is a comment line telling you what the memory should be like before the operation. Dividend as n, divisor as d. According to the code the next 3 cells should be empty as well, but it is ignored here, assuming you...
You need to properly handle nesting of [ and ]. I would do this by having a count variable. For example, when you encounter a [ and need to find the matching ], initialize count to 1 and go through the characters. When you come across a [, increment it;...
There's a trick you can use: a loop will not execute what's inside if it's not run and fits syntactically. [This is a comment.]+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++. Indeed, if you leave out the [], this will print a NUL byte too much. You still cannot use brackets though ;) This is akin to...