You don't need @Autowired on smtpHost, it should be already populated if you get the MailSender bean from the Spring context. Which you don't, because instantiating it with new MailSender() bypasses Spring altogether. Instead you should use context.getBean(MailSender.class).
PHP-DI cannot magically intercept when you create B (to inject A in B). You have to create B using PHP-DI: $b = $container->get('ClassB'); $b->methodB(); ...
c#,windows,hook,inject,easyhook
Using Deviare I managed to modify the PrintLogger example to achieve a easy hook. using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.ComponentModel; using System.Data; using System.Drawing; using System.Linq; using System.Runtime.InteropServices; using System.Text; using System.Windows.Forms; using Nektra.Deviare2; namespace PrintLogger { public partial class PrintLogger : Form { private NktSpyMgr _spyMgr; private NktProcess _process;...
There's no definite answer for this. However your first two questions @Inject vs @Autowired, JPA vs Hibernate, in my view have the same decision path. @Inject is a standard Java EE 6 (JSR-299) annotation, @Autowired is spring proprietary. In the same fashion, JPA is a specification, Hibernate is but one...
It's not Gson that is the problem. What is providing the SistemaControl in your SistemaMB class? From the stack trace it looks like nothing is. For example you could add a Produces method to this class: public class CriadorModule { @Produces public SistemaControl criarSistemaControl() { return new SistemaControl(); } @Produces...
Yes, this should work. It's OK for the process of constructing one instance to cause other injections to occur (in fact, this is the way dependency injection works normally). A probably better alternative for the same effect would be: @Inject Foo(Provider<Bar> barProvider) { this.bar = barProvider.get(); } Since this will...
For the sum: a.inject do |sum,n| break sum if sum > v sum + n end For the index, idea is the same - you use the memo as an array and keep the sum in the first element: a.inject([0,-1]) do |memo,n| break [memo[0], memo[1]] if memo[0] > v [memo[0]+n,...
angularjs,controller,scope,directive,inject
I was able to solve this, and here's the simple solution: (old code): <input type="file" file-input="files" multiple /> <button ng-click="upload()" type="button">Upload</button> <li ng-repeat="file in files">{{file.name}}</li> Replaced with this: <input type="file" file-input="test.files" multiple /> <button ng-click="upload()" type="button">Upload</button> <li ng-repeat="file in test.files">{{file.name}}</li> And this old code: .directive('fileInput', ['$parse', function($parse){...
Documentation says : Named services are simply keyed services that use a string as a key Named and Keyed Services It means that you can use the WithKey attribute with a string parameter to do what you want : public CoupDo( [WithKey("FLAG6")]ItemUserFlagCtrl Flag6Ctlr, [WithKey("FLAG5")]ItemUserFlagCtrl Flag5Ctlr) { ... } WithKeyAttribute is...
java,mocking,jersey,integration-testing,inject
Providers shouldn't have to be mocked. It is handled by the framework. Any providers you want added, just register with the ResourceConfig. I don't know what you care doing wrong in your attempt at this, but below is a complete working example where the ContextResolver is discovered just fine. If...
I think you are misunderstanding how modules are supposed to work. Modules don't create the objects, modules define rules for how objects might be created when they are needed. The reason MapBinder would help is that you would define all of the services in your radio buttons list, and then...
java,java-ee,dependency-injection,autowired,inject
You may write your own CDI producer for this purpose @Dependent public ClientFactory{ @Produces Client createClient() { return ClientBuilder.newClient(); } } Now you are able to use CDI's @Inject to get an instance within your Bean @ApplicationScoped public class MyConnector { @Inject private Client client; } With those kind of...
This operation is called scan or prefix_sum, but unfortunately, there is no implementation in the Ruby core library or standard libraries. However, your intuition is correct: you can implement it using Enumerable#inject. (Actually, Enumerable#inject is general, every iteration operation can be implemented using inject!) module Enumerable def scan(initial) inject([initial]) {|acc,...
The global dictionary of rab is baked in. You can see it at rab.func_globals. The attribute is readonly, so you can't replace it You can make a new function in foo and push the code from rab into it though :) type(rab)(rab.func_code, foo.__dict__) eg. ## rab.py import foo foo.bar() #...
ruby,arrays,functional-programming,inject
It's built in, and it is lazy: perms = ['A', 'B'].repeated_permutation(2) #use the resulting enumerator like this: perms.each{|perm| p perm} ...
implementation calls in interfaces, you can call more than 1 interface if you want by adding commas to separate them.. to call interface methods you simply just use the method's name. like this: public class MyEmailResponse implements IAssertionErrorDo { public void onErrorDo() {//define it's behavior} } if you extend a...
java,unit-testing,mockito,inject
It appears Mockito uses an algorithm described in their JavaDoc If I understand correctly, it will first sort on type (in this case only 1 B) and then sort on name (no changes here). It will finally inject using the OngoingInjector interface implementation, which appears to search for the first...
Code is apparently considered as C++ by the compiler. This is the reason you get an error. The problem is that BOOL and EL_FORCEINLINE are not defined. So the preprocessor translates BOOL EL_FORCEINLINE EL_DenyProcessAccess( void ) into EL_DenyProcessAccess( void ) You should make sure that BOOL is defined. In C...
If you know that @AutoConfig(provider = JsonConfigProvider) ConfigLoader<?> jsonConfig is going to return you exactly the results of jsonConfigProvider.get(), and JsonConfigProvider obviously has a public parameterless constructor for newInstance to work, why wouldn't you just ask for a JsonConfigProvider in the first place? Fundamentally Guice is just a Map<Key, Provider>...
spring,ejb,repository,autowired,inject
Spring beans and EJB are two different things, you can't just inject a Spring bean in an EJB, because that EJB is no Spring bean, so Spring doesn't know there is a field which should be injected by Spring (unless you use some fancy AOP stuff, which can enable injection...
javascript,angularjs,controller,modal-dialog,inject
So this is super embarassing. Basically when I copied and pasted the modal controller out of the previous place where I had it, I forgot to delete the old (string named) controller. Angular was randomly choosing between the two identically named modal controllers when opening the modal, and giving me...
java,spring,dependency-injection,annotations,inject
You should always prefer dependency injection, over getBean, or should i say avoid using getBean at all.. Dependency injection is very effective at associating loosely coupled components, and at configuring these components. Especially if the association between the components lasts throughout the lifetime of the components. More specifically, dependency injection...
java,inversion-of-control,guice,inject
I work out follow CustomInjections Code like this public class PropsModule extends AbstractModule { private final Props props; private final InProps inProps; private PropsModule(Props props) { this.props = props; this.inProps = InProps.in(props); } public static PropsModule of(Props props) { return new PropsModule(props); } @Override protected void configure() { bindListener(Matchers.any(), new...