javascript,prototype,prototype-chain
Two issues: The first parentFunction you define is in the constructor for Parent, not the prototype. So Parent.prototype.parentFunction isn't defined. Instead, there is a separate copy of the parentFunction for ever instance of Parent. In the Child constructor, this.constructor.prototype refers to the prototype of Child, not the prototype of Parent....
javascript,oop,inheritance,javascript-objects,prototype-chain
It is posible to inherit proprietyes and methods within object literals? Not yet, but with ES6, this will be possible: var foo = { __proto__: bar }; where bar becomes the prototype of foo. However, I rather think you mean whether it's possible to create objects with a specific...
javascript,inheritance,prototype,prototypal-inheritance,prototype-chain
Because Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty is non-enumerable: Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(Object.prototype, 'hasOwnProperty') .enumerable // false Therefore, it's not iterated by the for...in loop....
javascript,object,prototype,prototype-chain,prototype-oriented
I don't understand very much what you are attempting to do, but you can clone Object.prototype like this: var proto = Object.prototype, clone = Object.create(null), props = Object.getOwnPropertyNames(proto); for(var i=0; i<props.length; ++i) Object.defineProperty(clone, props[i], Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(proto, props[i]) ); Object.freeze(clone); ...
javascript,angularjs,prototype-chain
By default, every prototype has a constructor property that refers to the function that it "belongs" to. function A() { } console.log(A.prototype.constructor === A); // true If you overwrite a prototype in its entirety with an object literal or with some other constructed prototype, this constructor value will get wiped...
javascript,performance,prototype,prototype-chain
// This is bad: //foo.__proto__.bar = bar; // But this is okay Foo.prototype.bar = bar; No. Both are doing the same thing (as foo.__proto__ === Foo.prototype), and both are fine. They're just creating a bar property on the Object.getPrototypeOf(foo) object. What the statement refers to is assigning to the...
javascript,object,google-chrome-devtools,prototype-chain
Who knows? It appears to be a design decision on the part of the Chrome debugger's implementers. Unless someone here is privy to their decision process, I think this question is off topic. Perhaps they figured that you didn't need to be able to expand objects unless they have methods....