SPDY is definitely dying, now that HTTP/2 is an official specification. Firefox and Chrome already support HTTP/2, and servers start to deploy it instead of SPDY - Google, Twitter, etc. Internet Explorer support will arrive soon with IE 11. HTTP/2 is definitely gaining momentum, and the future will be on...
android,performance,okhttp,spdy,multiplexing
The multiplexing in SPDY interleaves requests and responses, so no call ever blocks on another call; they all just block on the available bandwidth. That said, can create two OkHttp instances, each with its own connection pool. OkHttpClient okHttpClient = new OkHttpClient(); okHttpClient.setConnectionPool(new ConnectionPool()); ...
on my system with PHP 5.5.19, and curl 7.39.0 , the answer is no. You can check what your curl support, by enabling "automatic" encoding, making curl list all supported encodings to the server (enable automatic by CURLOPT_ENCODING->empty string), then check the headers sent by curl, like this: <?php if(array_key_exists("curlcall",$_GET)){...
seo,semantics,shared-hosting,spdy,http2
how about SEO sematics, will it harm my ranking? It won't. are there any better solutions for this problems? It is not a problem. can i use ipv6 to mask the port somehow? No....
There is no limit to the number of concurrent requests. Whether this is a practical matter or not, I don't know, but I presume this is something realized in testing. You should consider reviewing the HTTP2 spec to see if that has changed there since that is the standardized version...
HTTP/2 has reached the status of official standard. You will have very little luck in determining whether websites support HTTP/2 by using the cleartext upgrade mechanism. The reason is that browsers don't support this style of upgrade to HTTP/2 (they all prefer using ALPN over TLS), and therefore neither servers...
Try to use: sendFileFuture = ctx.write(new HttpChunkedInput(new ChunkedFile(raf, 0, fileLength, 8192)), ctx.newProgressivePromise()); ...
Jetty does not support SPDY/3.1, only up to SPDY/3. In fact, Jetty will never support SPDY/3.1. SPDY and NPN were just removed from the code tree in the upcoming Jetty 9.3.0 release. http://git.eclipse.org/c/jetty/org.eclipse.jetty.project.git/commit/?id=2162455b72d5a474bba47d5daf5543d46c2688be...
Checkout this article. I think it should help with SPDY https://github.com/eigengo/opensourcejournal/blob/master/2014.1/spdynetty/spdynetty.md
Jetty does not support SPDY/3.1, only up to SPDY/3. In fact, Jetty will never support SPDY/3.1. SPDY and NPN were just removed from the code tree in the upcoming Jetty 9.3.0 release. http://git.eclipse.org/c/jetty/org.eclipse.jetty.project.git/commit/?id=2162455b72d5a474bba47d5daf5543d46c2688be...
For that particular configuration you want to run, I am afraid there is no way to get it working with SPDY or HTTP/2. Apache configured as a reverse proxy talks HTTP/1.1 to Jetty, so there is no way to get SPDY or HTTP/2 into the picture at all (considering you...
When you create a WebAppContext via an XML file, such as what is described in the Configuring a Specific WebApp Deployment. You can configure an id attribute for that particular webapp's <Configure> element. Example: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE Configure PUBLIC "-//Jetty//Configure//EN" "http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/configure_9_0.dtd"> <Configure id="myapp1" class="org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext"> <Set name="contextPath">/wiki</Set> <Set...